As usual, to make it easier to read, we highlighted those we predicted accurately in green, those we got wrong in red, and those which are yet to be clear in blue.
Profit is still elusive for ALL e-commerce platforms
We wrote this in December 2018:
“Low basket size, high logistics cost, heavy spending on discounts and advertisements with low sales conversion rate, and high commissions are some of the reasons. With the competition intensifying, e-commerce players will continue to burn cash in order to not lose market share.”
Since the beginning of this year, there has been a number of movements in the e-commerce space: just a few days ago, news came out that eBay is investing US$150 million in PayTM mall, while Warburg Pincus had pledged US$500 million in the warehousing arena in India together with partners.
People are still bullish about the long term prospects of this market.
Another piece of news is the seeming resurrection of Snapdeal. Maybe, new investors would want to give a try?
Social commerce continues to attract investment, not gross profitability
We can quote Pratik Poddar, VP of Nexus Venture Partners, in his recent guest post on TLD:
“However, we are learning that traditional e-commerce platforms don’t tap into all the natural buying behaviors of a large proportion of Indians. In a “family-oriented” economy like India, most consumers have traditionally made purchases along with their friends or relatives or based on a trusted recommendation.
“E-commerce 2.0” startups are tapping into this behavior by leveraging existing platforms such as WhatsApp and Instagram to facilitate recommendation leading to transactions.
Reseller models like Meesho, Shop101, and Glowroad where individuals recommend items to people on their network through social media platforms have gained impressive traction and are a win-win for all the parties involved. Resellers, typically stay at home wives, are empowered to start a business of their own, and customers can discover items that are better curated for them.
Newer models like commerce on top of video-based product catalogues, live streaming by sellers, social media influencer based selling, WhatsApp based sharing for group purchases, WhatsApp based retailers, etc. are now popping up and showing immense potential. “
Delhivery continues to lead delivery space, though competition continues to intensify in the last mile space
Although there are tonnes of complaints on social media about Delhivery’s service, we believe anyone else in Delhivery’s position (in terms of volume and market share) would face the same. With additional ammunition from Softbank, Delhivery would only run into trouble if it chooses to.
Club Factory officially gets stung by the government; more Chinese e-commerce players enter during the first half of the year
We wrote the following:
“But the cross-border e-commerce model is still in the grey zone because the Indian government has banned foreign companies from engaging in integrated retail business in India in order to “protect local SMEs” (that is why Walmart has been lobbying for many years and has been unable to enter India).”
Indeed, after the elections, the Indian customs started moving. Since June the parcel route to deliver cross border goods to Indian consumers has literally been shut. This was the preferred route of many independent Chinese cross border sites or platforms, including SheIn and Club Factory.
It is not clear what will come next – but as of now, it seems that Chinese manufacturing companies are more eager to set up facilities in India.
WhatsApp payment fails to take off
The beta test has been going on for more than a year – and Facebook is facing repeated delays on officially launching WhatsApp payment in India. The main hurdle is regulators – whether they are convinced that all the transactional data will reside on Indian soil. We learnt that Facebook has prepared the audit documents for submission – however, as of now, we are not entirely optimistic that all hurdles will be cleared by this year.
Investors are still struggling to identify good early-stage companies; many VCs go into seed investment/incubation
“To solve this issue, we expect more early-stage VCs to move even earlier, building incubators and even ventures, following what Kalaari has done with KStart.”
While we have seen earlier investments – Indian VCs do not seem to be as aggressive as Indonesian ones in incubation/going earlier stage.
Seeking new growth, major smartphone manufacturers go into venture capital
It is quite obvious that in addition to Xiaomi, other phone manufacturers are setting up investment/incubation teams. The results will take some time to be clear.
More entrepreneurs enter the fray to build direct-to-consumer brands
“Mobile internet has been the biggest enabler for new brands because they have the ability to reach out directly to consumers, through social media and through e-commerce. We expect more direct to consumer brands, good ones, to continue emerging in 2019.”
While we see more D2C brands being created, to categorise this as a major trend is still a bit pre-mature. A friend who recently gave up his D2C business said that the infrastructure is still patchy – figuring out the supply chain, online distribution and payment collection together in a scalable manner is not easy at all.
- Fintech lending would still attract big capital, though only the ones with good core of risk control and data would increase in valuation
“India’s fintech sector has generated a large number of well-funded startups over the past few years, covering various segments including SME financing, consumer credit, marketplaces and SaaS tools. More than $40 million in financing for a startup in this sector is not news anymore.
That said, the market is still in its infancy, especially consumer-facing business models. Regulators (we have to say that Indian regulators are usually very very smart) are keeping a close eye on the sector as well.”
Last month when we met a VC veteran in the country, the vibe we got was that since UPI, new, attractive fintech models are emerging fast – almost every week. However, for existing fintech lending players to scale, it seems to be challenging.
- Late-stage Chinese money still prefers to invest, instead of acquiring
“The sentiment of Chinese strategic investors towards the Indian market is those big opportunities are not to be missed, but at the same time, many are not confident in the short term (rightly so).
Also, India, though geographically much smaller, is a much more diverse country than China. To run a subsidiary in a vast foreign country, you need to be able to slowly sink in and plough. Mountains of challenges need to be overcome along the way.
Therefore, strategic investors are making bets in a way in which we see as not wanting to miss the boat, rather than making outright acquisitions to run the companies themselves.”
Over the last half a year, the sentiment continues that Chinese players are continuing to tour the market, however actual investments are few and far between. Later stage investors will have more pressure and fewer options to exit – this could be a good hurdle to overcome.